Skip to main content

On Big Exits

Tumblr's exit is amazing and likely worth it for both parties. Tumblr has something like 300 million users. Yahoo's at 700 million. Now I don't know what constitutes a user, but let's assume "active users" are readers of tumblogs, and that it's likely something well shy of 300 million.

No matter.

But this isn't about Tumblr. It's about startup aspirations. Congratulations, though, to Karp, Tumblr, and the backers. Great stuff.

How much is enough? Can you build a model that leads you to a billion dollar exit? Is that what motivates you every day?

It's not a bad exercise. Assume you're a fast-growing startup and you have $50 million in break-even revenue. Can you sell for 20 times revenue?

It depends on the buyer. But let's walk that  back to $50 million. It's easy to throw out numbers like that.

The back-of-napkin calculation is pretty simple; let's say you're a consumer-facing site with decent daily engagement.

Use Mint.com's assumptions for model: $30/year/user based on a free service, with revenue sources from affiliate deals and other revenue-sharing arrangements.

You need 1.66 million engaged users to hit that revenue number.

So how to you get to 1.66 million engaged users? How do you get to 100,000? Most of us don't know how to get to 10,000 engaged users.

Why not? Why can't we all be "growth hackers" (ugh)?

It's hard to get people's attention. It's hard to attract their interest and maintain their engagement. Eileen at Kleiner Perkins said to me a few years ago "you have to make it a daily habit" for people. At HonestlyNow, we tried to make it a daily habit, but the general users just weren't that interested.

So how can you turn your app or service into an essential, daily habit? Or rather, is your app or service essential?

The answer for most apps is no, no it's not essential to most people. And that's why you don't see massive exits like Tumblr's every day. Or Instagram.

Which gets me to this: a massive exit shouldn't be your goal. Developing something you care about that can be successful whether you sell it or not should be your goal.

Yes, if you're getting great traction and growth (not 1,000, not 5,000, but say 100,000) maybe you can start thinking bigger. But focus on making your thing great for you and for your core users.

A billion dollars isn't really cool. It's just a number. What's really cool is building something meaningful, useful, and profitable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Beta Signup

I've been working for quite a while on a new search concept, though the further in I get, the closer the rest of the world gets to what we're doing. So today I'm inviting you to sign up for the rather modest beta, which will be ready soon if we can nail down a few difficult  details. Jawaya is a way of navigating the web and getting better results. And that's as much as I can say right now, because we're not a funded startup, and things are moving really fast in this space--it's going to be very competitive. I predict there will be about 10 funded startups in the next 6 months doing something similar. One of them will be mine, and we aim to make it the best. We're raising a round of capital to fund the team, and are shooting for early sustainability. This is my fifth company; my fourth in the tech space, and my third software company. I think it will be the biggest and can possibly have a positive impact on the world by reducing the amount of time it takes

Where Innovation Happens

As I get closer to a go/no-go decision on a project, I've been thinking about the difference about my vision for the project and the supportive innovations to enable the core innovations The vision combines (in unequal parts) product, core innovation as I imagine it, the application of that core innovation, design, marketing,  developer ecosystem, and business development. The core innovation enables everything else, but it's the application of the innovation that makes it meaningful, useful, and in this case, fun. This week we're testing initial approaches to the implementation for our specific application, and that's where we'll develop the enabling innovations, which is basically where the rubber meets the road. The difference is that the enabling innovation happens at the source of real problems only encountered in the making of something, and in a project like this just getting the essence of it right isn't enough; it also has to be safe, the compone

The Real Jobs Problem

It's the economy, stupid.  Well, yes, it always has been, if you're in the distortion field of politics.  But whose economy? The pundits, the White House, the Republican candidates all miss the mark. They keep talking about debt, taxes, and monetary policy. None of those things tell the real story behind today's economy.  The Old Economy Keynes was right--in the old economy. Economy gets weak, pump some money into the economy through public works projects, which  1) puts people to work, which  2) boosts the economy and  3) generates new tax revenue, while  4) leaving us with another generation of reliable infrastructure to support  5) more growth (for growth's sake, which is another post).  The Beach Ball Imagine a beach ball, partially deflated to represent a recession. Got it? Now imagine the govt pumping that beach ball back up through sensible public investment (which we haven't seen for decades). The New Economy Same beach ball, same pum