Skip to main content

Getting to Alpha

I want a smaller web.

As I've been building Jawaya I've come to the realization that the ever-expanding web increases the daily noise that interferes with our lives. I'm not just talking about bots and content farms like Demand Media--it's the noise caused by irrelevant but decent quality information.

The question is, relevant to whom?

To me. To you. I read a lot about education, tech, politics, and food systems. Within each of those categories, there are hundreds (or thousands) of subcategories--that's a lot of content to sift through. So when I search for something, say "digital learning in middle schools", I get a wide range of results and have to sift through them, or narrow my search.

But I'm not great at narrowing. Or maybe I just have the patience for it. I'll try a number of iterations of the terms, but it doesn't matter because I have this nagging feeling that the good stuff is on Page 3.

Or Page 30.

I use search to discover--to find things that will help me learn something. So much attention is paid to the latest and greatest that a lot of valuable and relatively timeless information gets buried and obscured, regardless of its quality or relevance. And while I like the news, I'm not searching for news in most cases. Twitter brings me a lot of news I might not typically come across myself, so my twitter friends serve as curators of the latest and greatest.

Yet that's not enough; to me that's like drinking a specialty drink from the firehose, and when I've had enough, I've had enough. I don't go there to discover. It's more like a stream of information I can receive than a delivery system of things I'm seeking. I'll search there from time to time, but the results are more about what's happening now, rather than what i'm specifically seeking. It's not a search engine.

Google does a great job at some things. If I'm going somewhere, Google Maps is perfect. I use that as my local business directory--try finding a local business using Google Search vs Google Maps, and you'll see what I mean.

But like a lot of people actively complaining about search, I find Google's results to be confounding because of the search engine optimization gaming of results. It doesn't deliver the best quality content, it delivers the pages best targeted to Google's search algorithms.

I'm building Jawaya to help you (and me) get the best possible results, and I think that means delivering a smaller web. Smaller, but tastier. Like French food vs Chili's.

I like Blekko and DuckDuckGo--both have introduced helpful approaches that cut down the noise in the results. I've been reading a bunch of posts by the DDG founder--he's a really smart guy with better chops than I, and I'm hoping we get to partner some time.

We're taking a different approach, which I'll start talking about soon. We're wrapping the alpha release (taking longer than planned, as usual), which is an ugly but functional stab at the vision. As we bring on capital and more team members, we'll improve the look and feel and implement the full vision.

'Stealth' startups have a reason to stay under wraps--we're paranoid that someone will take a good idea and run with it. But I think it's time to get the conversation going and get people talking about the approach, because ultimately we want the best possible solution to the search problem, and that can't happen in a vacuum.

So tomorrow I'm showing Jawaya to an audience for the second time, this time to the Philly tech meetup. I'm nervous as hell because, well, we've worked hard and know we have a long way to go. But I'm confident we'll inspire a few people to consider joining the team to help build the vision.

This is always a tough period for a startup--lack of capital, lack of team, a stack of specs and ideas to work through, and the very real possibility the industry will arrive where we are before we get out of the gate. I'm really excited to start talking about it, to get feedback, to build a team of fun, smart, driven people who love solving big problems and helping people.

Game on--we're digging in.


  1. [...] Getting to Alpha « Charlie Crystle | EntrepreneurFeb 21, 2011 … Charlie Crystle | Entrepreneur. views about startups … [...]


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beta Signup

I've been working for quite a while on a new search concept, though the further in I get, the closer the rest of the world gets to what we're doing. So today I'm inviting you to sign up for the rather modest beta, which will be ready soon if we can nail down a few difficult  details. Jawaya is a way of navigating the web and getting better results. And that's as much as I can say right now, because we're not a funded startup, and things are moving really fast in this space--it's going to be very competitive. I predict there will be about 10 funded startups in the next 6 months doing something similar. One of them will be mine, and we aim to make it the best. We're raising a round of capital to fund the team, and are shooting for early sustainability. This is my fifth company; my fourth in the tech space, and my third software company. I think it will be the biggest and can possibly have a positive impact on the world by reducing the amount of time it takes

Where Innovation Happens

As I get closer to a go/no-go decision on a project, I've been thinking about the difference about my vision for the project and the supportive innovations to enable the core innovations The vision combines (in unequal parts) product, core innovation as I imagine it, the application of that core innovation, design, marketing,  developer ecosystem, and business development. The core innovation enables everything else, but it's the application of the innovation that makes it meaningful, useful, and in this case, fun. This week we're testing initial approaches to the implementation for our specific application, and that's where we'll develop the enabling innovations, which is basically where the rubber meets the road. The difference is that the enabling innovation happens at the source of real problems only encountered in the making of something, and in a project like this just getting the essence of it right isn't enough; it also has to be safe, the compone

The Real Jobs Problem

It's the economy, stupid.  Well, yes, it always has been, if you're in the distortion field of politics.  But whose economy? The pundits, the White House, the Republican candidates all miss the mark. They keep talking about debt, taxes, and monetary policy. None of those things tell the real story behind today's economy.  The Old Economy Keynes was right--in the old economy. Economy gets weak, pump some money into the economy through public works projects, which  1) puts people to work, which  2) boosts the economy and  3) generates new tax revenue, while  4) leaving us with another generation of reliable infrastructure to support  5) more growth (for growth's sake, which is another post).  The Beach Ball Imagine a beach ball, partially deflated to represent a recession. Got it? Now imagine the govt pumping that beach ball back up through sensible public investment (which we haven't seen for decades). The New Economy Same beach ball, same pum