Skip to main content

Disqus Digests

This morning my phone dinged with a fresh notification--a new email! What oh what could it be? 

I rush over to check while thinking "I need to unsubscribe to a lot of stuff so I get fewer non-urgent dinging notifications."

Well shoot, that's disappointing. It's Disqus Digests, one of the biggest wastes of dopamine anticipation ever. 

It simply sucks. 

Disqus itself is great as a commenting system. I've been there since the beginning and have mostly enjoyed its evolution. 

And then they did this interruptive, irrelevant email.

Well why does it suck, you say. 

Every one of these "Digests" sends a few comments from a blog conversation in which I've already participated. That means it's very, very likely that I've seen the comments before. 

So I open the mail, see something I've already read, and curse Daniel and Company for enticing me into wasting my time, and cursing myself for falling for it. 

So I unsubscribed. 

Here's the other side of the criticism--the optimism of dissent: it would be better (and not that hard for that talented crew) to send thematically relevant comments from other sites. I already know AVC.com and was just there a few minutes ago. Don't send me comments from there. I've likely seen most of them, and if I haven't it's because I'm not really interested in that conversation anymore. Been there. What's next? 

If instead you sent me links to other conversations that you know I'd be interested in because I send you a boatload of signals just by commenting (let's see... my comment, the comment I responded to, responses or lack thereof to my comments, likes I get, likes I give, other Disqus sites I visit, Disqus sites I where I comment, etc, etc) and you have tons of signals of relevant comments, people, blog posts from across the Disqusophere, well, let's just say you can approximate something that is far superior than a lame summation of a few comments that happened at the shindig I've already dug. 

I was hoping to post something more startup-y for my first post in a month, but maybe here's the lesson for startups: just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.

Anyone other lessons here?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Beta Signup

I've been working for quite a while on a new search concept, though the further in I get, the closer the rest of the world gets to what we're doing. So today I'm inviting you to sign up for the rather modest beta, which will be ready soon if we can nail down a few difficult  details. Jawaya is a way of navigating the web and getting better results. And that's as much as I can say right now, because we're not a funded startup, and things are moving really fast in this space--it's going to be very competitive. I predict there will be about 10 funded startups in the next 6 months doing something similar. One of them will be mine, and we aim to make it the best. We're raising a round of capital to fund the team, and are shooting for early sustainability. This is my fifth company; my fourth in the tech space, and my third software company. I think it will be the biggest and can possibly have a positive impact on the world by reducing the amount of time it takes

Where Innovation Happens

As I get closer to a go/no-go decision on a project, I've been thinking about the difference about my vision for the project and the supportive innovations to enable the core innovations The vision combines (in unequal parts) product, core innovation as I imagine it, the application of that core innovation, design, marketing,  developer ecosystem, and business development. The core innovation enables everything else, but it's the application of the innovation that makes it meaningful, useful, and in this case, fun. This week we're testing initial approaches to the implementation for our specific application, and that's where we'll develop the enabling innovations, which is basically where the rubber meets the road. The difference is that the enabling innovation happens at the source of real problems only encountered in the making of something, and in a project like this just getting the essence of it right isn't enough; it also has to be safe, the compone

The Real Jobs Problem

It's the economy, stupid.  Well, yes, it always has been, if you're in the distortion field of politics.  But whose economy? The pundits, the White House, the Republican candidates all miss the mark. They keep talking about debt, taxes, and monetary policy. None of those things tell the real story behind today's economy.  The Old Economy Keynes was right--in the old economy. Economy gets weak, pump some money into the economy through public works projects, which  1) puts people to work, which  2) boosts the economy and  3) generates new tax revenue, while  4) leaving us with another generation of reliable infrastructure to support  5) more growth (for growth's sake, which is another post).  The Beach Ball Imagine a beach ball, partially deflated to represent a recession. Got it? Now imagine the govt pumping that beach ball back up through sensible public investment (which we haven't seen for decades). The New Economy Same beach ball, same pum