Skip to main content

Specialists Become Specialty Aggregators

Andy Weissman of USV posted about the unbundling of all things web--apps become APIs, and ...
"that education is being unbundled into its component parts: content, teachers, credentials, community, physical campus, mentors, hiring and network."

I weighed in... 
Hasn't Google become more like AOL in some senses? Plus, hangouts, docs, email, etc. 
It seems inevitable for the niche gorilla to continue to add new products and more niches, becoming an aggregator like the one they might have initially displaced. 
Interesting that Twitter has not taken that approach. Facebook has. LinkedIn has, though perhaps more naturally and narrower than Google. Stack has (hi joel), in very natural and sensible ways.
And Andy asked...
that's interesting - is the tendency of the unbundler to always try to re-bundle? I thought about it some more... 
The tendency is toward revenue growth, which leads to adding products or features that drive revenue toward the core model. If Twitter were public, the public market demand for revenue growth would likely lead it to "portalize" or add services (say image storage, archiving, analytics, front end tools, etc)
With Google, it makes sense for them to capture more web traffic to drive its revenue engine; that explains Android, the wifi investments, Plus, etc. Search is--as big as it is--a finite market (number of people x avg number of searches). 
Note Google hasn't added other revenue models in any significant way; at its core its a lead-gen engine and needs to feed it in any way possible.
That's the armchair view, anyway. EDIT: I guess that's a way of saying that fragmentation is not a final state of any market; there's a natural ebb and flow from specializing to generalizing, and a new crop of specialists disrupting the new generalists.

It's an interesting discussion to me, which is partly why I'm reblogging it. But what's also interesting to me is that it in itself is content that I felt like reblogging, but it was a pain to do it. 

Plus, the most interesting part of the blog post was the in the commentary itself; some of the comments are what I'd consider top-level content. But it's not treated as that.

You'll see in the upper right of this blog, under my Office Hours, is a search box supplied by indexes both the blog post and the comments, which makes discovering relevant content much more useful and robust than typical site search. 

I'm particularly interested in community and theses around it; the one that strikes me the most is that a community strengthens with increases in the number and quality of connections among its members. 

Last year I started toying with some ideas around that thesis, specifically with respect to comments and other web activity and discovering people with similar interests or expertise, which is a big part of Jawaya. So I was pretty stoked to see a few months ago--it's a step in the right direction.

If you're interested in trying, please email me and I'll get you hooked up, or contact Kevin Marshall, the mind behind the tool. 
  • Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Beta Signup

    I've been working for quite a while on a new search concept, though the further in I get, the closer the rest of the world gets to what we're doing. So today I'm inviting you to sign up for the rather modest beta, which will be ready soon if we can nail down a few difficult  details. Jawaya is a way of navigating the web and getting better results. And that's as much as I can say right now, because we're not a funded startup, and things are moving really fast in this space--it's going to be very competitive. I predict there will be about 10 funded startups in the next 6 months doing something similar. One of them will be mine, and we aim to make it the best. We're raising a round of capital to fund the team, and are shooting for early sustainability. This is my fifth company; my fourth in the tech space, and my third software company. I think it will be the biggest and can possibly have a positive impact on the world by reducing the amount of time it takes

    Where Innovation Happens

    As I get closer to a go/no-go decision on a project, I've been thinking about the difference about my vision for the project and the supportive innovations to enable the core innovations The vision combines (in unequal parts) product, core innovation as I imagine it, the application of that core innovation, design, marketing,  developer ecosystem, and business development. The core innovation enables everything else, but it's the application of the innovation that makes it meaningful, useful, and in this case, fun. This week we're testing initial approaches to the implementation for our specific application, and that's where we'll develop the enabling innovations, which is basically where the rubber meets the road. The difference is that the enabling innovation happens at the source of real problems only encountered in the making of something, and in a project like this just getting the essence of it right isn't enough; it also has to be safe, the compone

    The Real Jobs Problem

    It's the economy, stupid.  Well, yes, it always has been, if you're in the distortion field of politics.  But whose economy? The pundits, the White House, the Republican candidates all miss the mark. They keep talking about debt, taxes, and monetary policy. None of those things tell the real story behind today's economy.  The Old Economy Keynes was right--in the old economy. Economy gets weak, pump some money into the economy through public works projects, which  1) puts people to work, which  2) boosts the economy and  3) generates new tax revenue, while  4) leaving us with another generation of reliable infrastructure to support  5) more growth (for growth's sake, which is another post).  The Beach Ball Imagine a beach ball, partially deflated to represent a recession. Got it? Now imagine the govt pumping that beach ball back up through sensible public investment (which we haven't seen for decades). The New Economy Same beach ball, same pum