Skip to main content

Open the Silos

First we connected terminals to mainframes in a hub and spoke model.
Then we connected the spokes.

But the connectivity was highly limited--sending files, accessing an application, maybe accessing a central database in the old client-server model.

Then came the web and we went back to the hub and spoke model, but on a different scale and with different user interfaces.

Then came peer to peer software, where you could connect directly to me without a server in between.

SILOS
But in each of these, there were technologies, data, applications, and data in silos: each limited to activity within its own container, with perhaps limited connectivity.


Then we came to the current but unfinished phase of converting from closed silos to interconnected ones on a per application basis, largely through APIs, and now evolving to interconnectedness through sets of open APIs that open the door to discrete functionality within the apps.


Much more data is available and accessible. Access to the data is much simpler, though many tech companies keep that access to a restricted level, afraid of how an open approach might undermine them.

In many cases, we call the connectedness sharing. It's a great word--it implies generosity, but there's reciprocation in sharing. On Facebook, we share our networks, which can then interact without our management of the connections.

On Soundcloud we share music files.

On Twitter we share pithy sentiments, links, photos, much like Facebook.

Looking at our personal data, we can now share our credit card transactions. I'm not sure why anyone would do this, but it opens up the credit card info silo, which can be very powerful for analysis and influence marketing.

END OF SILOS?
It will take another decade, perhaps, to get to the point where any silo exists by choice, not by poor design or technological limitations.

It will look much more like this, where each function is available, each piece of data could be grabbed and paired with another and then processed by each function, organized not just by its owner, but by the interconnected crowd which might remix it into something entirely new.



Maybe call that creative reuse. We can't re-use or re-purporse what we can't access.

We will optionally share every activity and piece of data on our smartphones, which will no longer be called that in all likelihood.

Any device. Each device could also share its processing resources, like SETI, and perhaps we'll enable that in exchange for lower bills.

The technology is already there (see node.js for iOS); the adoption is not universal.

CLOSED = $
The company with the highest market cap is Apple. It's also one of the most closed. I don't have access to your iTunes songs from another app. I can't really design an app that accesses that, or your usage a la Spotify.

Google is selectively siloed.

Microsoft is highly siloed, but is progressively moving to a more open model.

And Oracle, Oracle is taking Apple's lead, and slowly but steadily reducing its participation in the open source world and limiting more, not less.

There are all highly profitable companies--the biggest in the tech world--and there's something to that. Just because you can open up everything doesn't mean it will make you money.

Are they in danger of being overtaken by the open, interconnected world? Sure--as long as the new disruptors serve their customers better--and make the path to adoption much easier.

NEW OPPORTUNITIES
So what's still in silos that once opened can inspire entirely new generations of open, interconnected applications? And why would you do it?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Beta Signup

I've been working for quite a while on a new search concept, though the further in I get, the closer the rest of the world gets to what we're doing. So today I'm inviting you to sign up for the rather modest beta, which will be ready soon if we can nail down a few difficult  details. Jawaya is a way of navigating the web and getting better results. And that's as much as I can say right now, because we're not a funded startup, and things are moving really fast in this space--it's going to be very competitive. I predict there will be about 10 funded startups in the next 6 months doing something similar. One of them will be mine, and we aim to make it the best. We're raising a round of capital to fund the team, and are shooting for early sustainability. This is my fifth company; my fourth in the tech space, and my third software company. I think it will be the biggest and can possibly have a positive impact on the world by reducing the amount of time it takes

Where Innovation Happens

As I get closer to a go/no-go decision on a project, I've been thinking about the difference about my vision for the project and the supportive innovations to enable the core innovations The vision combines (in unequal parts) product, core innovation as I imagine it, the application of that core innovation, design, marketing,  developer ecosystem, and business development. The core innovation enables everything else, but it's the application of the innovation that makes it meaningful, useful, and in this case, fun. This week we're testing initial approaches to the implementation for our specific application, and that's where we'll develop the enabling innovations, which is basically where the rubber meets the road. The difference is that the enabling innovation happens at the source of real problems only encountered in the making of something, and in a project like this just getting the essence of it right isn't enough; it also has to be safe, the compone

Disqus Digests

This morning my phone dinged with a fresh notification--a new email! What oh what could it be?  I rush over to check while thinking "I need to unsubscribe to a lot of stuff so I get fewer non-urgent dinging notifications." Well shoot, that's disappointing. It's Disqus Digests, one of the biggest wastes of dopamine anticipation ever.  It simply sucks.  Disqus itself is great as a commenting system. I've been there since the beginning and have mostly enjoyed its evolution.  And then they did this interruptive, irrelevant email. Well why does it suck, you say.  Every one of these "Digests" sends a few comments from a blog conversation in which I've already participated. That means it's very, very likely that I've seen the comments before.  So I open the mail, see something I've already read, and curse Daniel and Company for enticing me into wasting my time, and cursing myself for falling for it.  So I unsub