Skip to main content

Thoughts on Google + Moto

Google purchases Motorola for 12.5 billion in a defensive move to get Motorola's patents. Motorola has 19,000 employees, Google has 29,000.

The reactions across the board have been about the patents, the employee count, and Google taking a risk with hardware. Highly risky, yadda yadda.

Patents--yes. The rest of it is speculation, of course.

Here's my quick take, for what it's worth:

  • This is not a merger, it's an acquisition. Because of this, cultural issues, employee issues will be minimal. 
  • This is chess, not checkers. They've made the first of a number of moves, some of which are acquisitions, some of which are internal technology, and some of which are partnerships. To look at this as anything but a strategic first step is simplistic. 
  • Google's search business is under significant threat from Twitter, Facebook, Bing, and any answer discovery tool out there. 
  • Twitter does not--currently--have a compelling revenue model. And they know it, and Wall Street knows it, which means an IPO will be tougher.
  • Google will buy Twitter. Or it should. The value of the signals is worth at least 12.5 billion. Very few companies have the ability to monetize that, though we are trying. 
  • Microsoft is not dead, and it is incredibly relevant. 
  • Google will indeed make a phone, and I'll guess it will be at least competitive with the iPhone. Regardless, the Motorola acquisition gives a very expensive design shop. I could see Eric Schmidt moving over to manage it, restructuring it, and giving the Google vision guys proper access to exploit the best of Motorola's teams, ideas, and facilities. 
  • Google's phone partners will not jump ship. They might shop around, but I doubt they'll lose more than one or two minor players. Why? Android matters. IBM licensed PC architecture to dozens of companies, while selling their own as well. 


Popular posts from this blog

Beta Signup

I've been working for quite a while on a new search concept, though the further in I get, the closer the rest of the world gets to what we're doing. So today I'm inviting you to sign up for the rather modest beta, which will be ready soon if we can nail down a few difficult  details. Jawaya is a way of navigating the web and getting better results. And that's as much as I can say right now, because we're not a funded startup, and things are moving really fast in this space--it's going to be very competitive. I predict there will be about 10 funded startups in the next 6 months doing something similar. One of them will be mine, and we aim to make it the best. We're raising a round of capital to fund the team, and are shooting for early sustainability. This is my fifth company; my fourth in the tech space, and my third software company. I think it will be the biggest and can possibly have a positive impact on the world by reducing the amount of time it takes

Where Innovation Happens

As I get closer to a go/no-go decision on a project, I've been thinking about the difference about my vision for the project and the supportive innovations to enable the core innovations The vision combines (in unequal parts) product, core innovation as I imagine it, the application of that core innovation, design, marketing,  developer ecosystem, and business development. The core innovation enables everything else, but it's the application of the innovation that makes it meaningful, useful, and in this case, fun. This week we're testing initial approaches to the implementation for our specific application, and that's where we'll develop the enabling innovations, which is basically where the rubber meets the road. The difference is that the enabling innovation happens at the source of real problems only encountered in the making of something, and in a project like this just getting the essence of it right isn't enough; it also has to be safe, the compone

The Real Jobs Problem

It's the economy, stupid.  Well, yes, it always has been, if you're in the distortion field of politics.  But whose economy? The pundits, the White House, the Republican candidates all miss the mark. They keep talking about debt, taxes, and monetary policy. None of those things tell the real story behind today's economy.  The Old Economy Keynes was right--in the old economy. Economy gets weak, pump some money into the economy through public works projects, which  1) puts people to work, which  2) boosts the economy and  3) generates new tax revenue, while  4) leaving us with another generation of reliable infrastructure to support  5) more growth (for growth's sake, which is another post).  The Beach Ball Imagine a beach ball, partially deflated to represent a recession. Got it? Now imagine the govt pumping that beach ball back up through sensible public investment (which we haven't seen for decades). The New Economy Same beach ball, same pum